Shoring up the fragile innovation system, call GE

1.0Paul4innovatinghttps://paul4innovating.blogactiv.eupaul4innovatinghttps://paul4innovating.blogactiv.eu/author/paul4innovating/Shoring up the fragile innovation system, call GEWell, the World Economic forum’s annual meeting is beckoning later this month. During the period of 25th to 29th January the WEF attempts to engage business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.( <a href="http://www.weforum.org/">http://www.weforum.org/</a>) Just released on 18th January is the GE Global Innovation Barometer with its results of its second annual review on innovation. Here is the source site to check out and explore your own needs : <a href="http://www.ge.com/innovationbarometer/">http://www.ge.com/innovationbarometer/</a> This becomes a useful document within the European countries to gauge innovation. It does provide indicators of the growing gap between lagging innovaion policy and business needs to keep the innovation engine running. We are in risk of some 'stalling' in growth if that engine does not stay well tuned. So the report has some timely messages for both politicans and business leaders. The aim of the release is to use this and have this available for the meeting in Davos as well as shape GE’s innovation agenda going forward. For the Davos meeting lets hope our leaders have the time and inclination to review its content. No doubt GE will be there and if Beth Comstock is going as the senior vice president and chief marketing officer of GE I’m sure she will be leading the “innovation does matter” charge. She is emphasising a number of vital points that are arising from this survey. Let me provide a few, her rallying cry for business leaders is to understand where and how their innovation strategies are being challenged and to drive towards new solutions. The report raises all the uncertainties found in today’s market place are challenging business’ ability to innovate. There is a growing restriction on accessing external funding or a conservative attitude and appetite for risk. Some would argue this ‘hording’ of cash, of not investing at this time does push us into more of a deeper hole so how can this be resolved. Enter the political group to provide a more confident environment for investment so let’s trust some resolution of resolve and consensus emerges out of this meeting of minds. The top line summary taken from this GE barometer taken in October/ November 2011 <ul> <li>• 9 of 10 executives report economic crisis negatively impacts their ability to innovate</li> <li>• View innovation as primary driver of economic growth, jobs, quality of life</li> <li>• Pro-innovation markets produce better economic results</li> <li>• New model for innovation in the 21st century validated</li> <li>• USA, Japan, Germany, China still perceived as most innovative</li> </ul> The continued belief, confirmed by the majority of business leaders interviewed is that innovation continues as the main driver of prosperity, competitiveness and job creation, and but also points out how challenging and uncertain the present economic and political environments we are in, may hinder companies’ ability to deliver meaningful innovation. My one comment here on this- Leaders please ‘walk the talk’ on innovation. A partnership paradox I found more than interesting in the release by GE that a disconnect has surfaced between the importance of partnerships and the need to pursue them in the near term. There is a clear confirmation (86% of those surveyed) that partenerships are an important component of the new model of innovation but only 21% believe finding partners is an immediate priority to innovate more on a day-to-day basis My comment here: That is a real disconnect between the present belief and momentum supposedly going on in open innovation and the possible activity taking place in the trenches and what the top knows about. That gap if it is there I think needs urgently addressing to get everyone on the same collaborative page. Might actually “put the cat amongst the pigeons” for many. Creating conditions for meaningful innovation There is a reminder that one-size does not fit all. At the global level innovation continues to move towards an open, more collaborative model, innovation at the local level presents a complex landscape of challenges and opportunities that broad strokes can’t resolve. These constraints or nuances need to be dealt with at the market level as perceptions on innovations ‘place’ are radically different. This is where the barometer has some good insights for those applying global innovation across different market situations. My comment here: Adopting a more flexible approach to innovation might have increasing value, especially in these more uncertain times where discontinuities will increase more than decrease. Embracing the new innovation approach The report reflects on the needed shift for innovation to thrive in the 21st century. That is embracing a new paradigm, one that engenders this collaboration need between several partners, values the creative power of smaller organizations and individuals, and tailors solutions to meet local needs. Business leaders around the world agree that great innovations in the 21st century will be about shared value — addressing both human needs and the bottom line – versus delivering profit alone. <ul> <li>• More than ever, 88 percent of executives agreed that the way companies will innovate in the 21st century is totally different than ever before.</li> <li>• 77 percent of executives acknowledged that individuals and small- to mid-sized enterprises have the ability to be as innovative as large companies.</li> <li>• 73 percent agreed that innovation will be driven by people’s creativity over scientific research.</li> </ul> My comment here: Again, I have to question this, not the notion or intent but the real understanding. I would argue innovation still has not got the appropriate attention and critical understanding at leadership level for the vast majority. To believe they are taking us through a new paradigm is a tough one, I would suggest they are being dragged ‘kicking and screaming’ into the 21st century, hanging on to tried and tested 20th century practices. My second comment here: The danger for executives in larger organizations does lie in the second point- individuals and small-to-mid-sized enterprises do have the ability to match and often exceed them in innovation. In individuals and small units or the smaller pockets of like minded communities does lie the potential of creativity and large organizations are struggling to get their heads around this dilemma. Convergence and Divergence- narrow the gap. So I hope the combined forces of Beth Comstock, GE and its global innovation barometer discussed in Davos provides a platform for strengthening innovation’s message at the leadership level. I would certainly feel within GE it is shifting the focus in their own innovation challenges and as they absorb the outcomes of this barometer I look forward to seeing more innovating coming from them. Come on GE lead the way and show that continued willingness to take risks and engage across and with society. It is better than the alternatives that many leaders are taking- to reduce innovation where they will eventually pay that price. Get the innovation message across Beth please. The Global Economy needs innovation more than ever to move forward.rich